Insurance, September 2025

Government Issues Draft Rules In Preparation For 100% Foreign Investment Being Permitted In Indian Insurance Companies.

On 29 August 2025, the Ministry of Finance issued draft rules (“Draft Rules”) to amend the Indian Insurance (Foreign Investment) Rules, 2015 (“Foreign Investment Rules”). The Foreign Investment Rules prescribe conditions for foreign investment in Indian insurance companies and insurance intermediaries including related to governance and repatriation of dividend.

This is the most recent regulatory move, and yet another indication,  by the Indian Government to enable 100% foreign direct investment (“FDI”) in Indian insurance companies, and follows the announcement by the Finance Minister (“FM”) on 1 February 2025 that 100% FDI would be allowed in the insurance sector (see our previous alert). As part of this announcement, the FM had stated that current guardrails and conditionalities associated with FDI will be reviewed and simplified and the amendments proposed in the Draft Rules are indicative of the much more relaxed regime that the Government is proposing.

KEY CHANGES PROPOSED TO THE FOREIGN INVESTMENT RULES
  • FDI cap: The 74% FDI limit will be deleted and the FDI limited will be set out in the Insurance Act, 1938, which is proposed to be amended to permit 100% FDI in Indian insurance companies.
  • Residency requirement: Currently, an Indian insurance company with FDI is required to have majority of its directors and key management persons as resident Indian citizens. This condition is now proposed to be deleted. However, the requirement that at least one individual among the chairperson, managing director, or chief executive officer of an Indian insurer be a resident Indian citizen is proposed to be retained.
  • Board composition: Currently, if an insurance company has more than 49% FDI, then at least 50% of its board of directors must comprise of independent directors unless the chairperson is an independent director in which case, at least 1/3rd of its board will have to comprise of independent directors. This requirement is proposed to be deleted providing insurance companies with more flexibility regarding their board composition.
  • Dividends and repatriation: Currently, an insurance company with more than 49% FDI is required to retain 50% of its net profits in general reserves if its solvency margin is less than 180% (i.e., 1.2 times the prescribed threshold of 150%). This restricts dividend payouts, and the Draft Rules propose to delete this requirement thereby allowing insurance companies to freely declare and repatriate dividends, provided they maintain the prescribed solvency margin and adhere to regulatory requirements.
  • Relaxation for insurance intermediaries: Currently, an insurance intermediary with majority foreign shareholding is required to have at least one individual among its chairperson, managing director, principal officer, or chief executive officer to be a resident Indian citizen. This requirement is proposed to be deleted. Additionally, prior IRDAI approval for repatriation of dividends by an insurance intermediary is also proposed to be deleted and payment restrictions on payments to foreign group, promoter, subsidiary, interconnected, or associate entities is proposed to be deleted.

While the above conditions were not viewed as particularly onerous for foreign investors, their removal would still be a welcome step and allow insurance companies and their foreign promoters great freedom in structuring and administering their India business. Being allowed to set up an independent business, without depending on a local partner, is likely to be gamechanger when foreign insurers consider and develop their India strategy.

In addition to finalising the Draft Rules, the Government has to implement other amendments including to the Insurance Act, other insurance regulations and the foreign exchange control rules before 100% FDI can be made in Indian insurance companies. Press reports suggest that the amendments to the Insurance Act may be taken up during the winter session of the Parliament.

Authors: Deepa Christopher – Partner and Rebha Dakshini – Partner 

Disclaimer: This alert only highlights key issues and is not intended to be comprehensive. The contents of this alert do not constitute any opinion or determination on, or certification in respect of, the application of Indian law by Talwar Thakore & Associates (“TT&A”). No part of this alert should be considered an advertisement or solicitation of TT&A’s professional services.

Deepa Christopher

Partner, Bengaluru

Rebha Dakshini

Partner, Mumbai

Disclaimer

By browsing this website you agree that you are, of your own accord, seeking further information regarding TT&A. No part of this website should be construed as an advertisement of or solicitation for our professional services. No information provided on this shall be construed as legal advice.